Climate Action Network - South Asia (CANSA)
Home| Contact Us   

CANSA > Research Area

CANSA

  
About CANSA

  CANSA Activities

  Main Scientific Issues

  Research Area

  CANSA Executive Board

  CANSA Coordination Group

  CANSA Members

  Future Programme

  CLIME-ASIA – Newsletter

  CLIME-ASIA – Editorial Board

  Participants of
    First Regional Meeting

  Contact Information

 

Research Areas

CANSA members felt that neither the INC nor the UNICED processes were adequately addressing some of the priority questions of Southern countries, particularly the South Asian countries. Further, CANSA members recognized that there were some myths about population issues and the consumption questions were not highlighted sufficiently in the research. It was also noted that climate change will exacerbate climate related natural disasters and the poor would again be victims due to climatic instabilities. Thus the First Regional Meeting of CANSA identified the following three key research areas for focussing CANSA research activities.

1. Climate and Poverty 

The objective of the research is to establish the linkages between poverty and climate change. For both the government and the NGOs in South Asia, poverty alleviation is the central focus of their planning efforts. Poverty is already an unbearable state and is a major retarding force in development. Impacts of climate change are likely to affect those who are already most vulnerable. The issues arising out of the discussions and which may be included in the paper are : 

  • What is the contribution of the poor to the Global Warming problem at the levels of :

    • individual
    • household
    • community
    • country
  • How much control do the poor have over their existing life style? To what extent do the poor have to adapt, migrate or to change agronomic practices as a consequence of impacts of GCC? 
     
  • What role do international forces play in perpetuating and directing life-style of the poor through trade, aid or determining research agenda?
     
  • While it has been argued that it is difficult to identify winners or losers of climate change at a conceptual level, in reality, the poorest are the least able to bear the burden of change and consequently, the greatest losers. For example, the impact of cyclone of similar intensity killed over 100,000 people in Bangladesh while the casualty in the Mississippi delta was less than one hundred. The relative impacts on the country's economy are qualitatively different. The ability of the poor to bounce back is limited and their existing vulnerability is accentuated by climate change related impacts. 
     
  • Dynamics of poverty is independent of climate, but exacerbated by climate change.
     
  • The life-style forced on the poor and imposed developmental prescriptions have assumed a direct and proportional relationship between living standards, energy needs and therefore GHG emission. This paradigm must be challenged and the forces that perpetuate this must be overcome.  
     
  • Technology Status is a determinant e.g., biomass burning can be made more efficient to provide higher level of energy service. 
     
  • The relatively longer time-scale of climate change distorts priority of economic planning. Economic planners feel a compulsion to deal with desperate poverty needs which shortens time horizons, making them less able to deal with longer yet inevitable change. This perpetuates the long-term state of poverty. 
     
  • Perception of poverty is a function of state of development or economic status. Northern CAN groups will need to be motivated to undertake the poverty linkages with climate and make it a priority issue in their own governments.  

 

2. Climate, Environment and Population 

There is an unchallenged contention that there is a causal and direct link between increased population and climate change. Population is linked to climate change only through the intermediate stage or process of consumption. This fact may be illustrated by the GHG equivalent population distribution curves. 

The major focus of this research project will be : 

  • Looking at the relationship population, energy consumption and GHG emission.
     
  • Policy action should be directed at the climate-consumption link rather than targeting at the population-climate links only.
     
  • Whereas control or regulation of human activities is an accepted legitimate function of govt. controls of the right to reproduce present far thornier ethical questions specially if imposed as a result of international negotiations. Direct regulation of population presents enormous socio-political disruption (e.g., Indira's India. 1977 and China's female infanticide).
     
  • Factors determining population growth : Certain increase in standard of living as measured in PQLI (Physical Quality of Life Index) will reduce population growth (e.g. Kerala, Sri Lanka and Europe in early twentieth country).
     
  • Role of women : Women literacy and awareness has a far greater impact on population growth rate than only contraception practices.
     
  • Regional relationship and life style : While more affluent societies consume for luxury, poorer societies are involved in subsistence activities. They are qualitatively different and need to be treated as such.
     
  • While countries (regions) should control population? Or, should consumption be controlled to make the greater impact on climate change?
     
  • Undoubtedly, in a future the emissions of the developing countries would increase with the expansion of the economies. The rate of growth and the cumulative levels of emission will be integrated factoring in historical emission of industrialized countries.
     
  • It has been proven that development is the best antidote for population growth.

 

3.   Climate Change and Natural Disasters 

The impacts of Global Climate Change include sea-level rise affecting coastal areas and island states, greater intensity of cyclones and probably enhanced precipitation in monsoon areas. These have their reinforcing feed-back mechanisms. 

A recent study (November 1991) published by Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies that : "The coastal areas of Bangladesh were devastated by a cyclone in 1991. Victims of the 29 April 1991 cyclone and tidal bore were all components of the environment : human beings, animals, trees, soils and water bodies. Floods cyclones, tidal bores and earthquakes are not the only disasters; poverty is also a disaster. The impact of a natural disaster is determined by the extent of devastation caused by the event. When resources are already scarce and the baseline is under pressure, the advent of a disaster stretches the fabric of society to its limits." 

If the same cyclone were to hit the US coast of the Mississippi Delta, the loss of human life probably would be less than one per cent of that of Bangladesh. The infrastructure loss in absolute monetary terms may be larger but as a proportion of national GDP or annual budget would be insignificant in the case of say, the USA, while it is a major and signify cant proportion of Bangladesh's economy.

Another example is that the Netherlands may be in a position to protect itself against one metre sea-level rise, while the Maldives neither has the means not the real possibility to take effective mitigation measures. 

Thus the impact of a natural disaster is as much a function of the causal event as of the economic status of and the capacity to cope by the communities and countries that are affected. 

It also appears that poorer communities which are already vulnerable to natural disasters are again going to be the victims of impacts of GCC and consequently exposed to even greater vulnerability. 

Thus the main focus of the research will be : 

  • Identification of linkages between types of natural disasters and impacts of climate change.
     
  • Attempt to identify special vulnerable areas which are prone to natural disasters and impacts of climate change related events.
     
  • Attempt to quantify, with some case-studies, the likely scenario of some events based on historical data and climate change predictions to consider the following :
    • impact on population

    • impact on ecosystems

    • impact on infrastructure, development efforts.

  • Undertake some case-studies on perceptions of likely victims, their coping strategies, likely mitigation measures and cost of such measures, and where, if any, will the required resource come from.
  • try to evaluate people's perception on global climate change and intensification of disasters.
  • Attempt to outline policy issues relating to Global Climate Change and Natural Disasters.
  • Identify the linkages to attribute responsibility and enhance awareness on the issue at different levels :
    • Negotiators at INC
    • Government leaders
    • NGOs in North and South
    • Research and scientific communities
    • Media and public
    • Likely to be affected and already vulnerable communities.

 


Site Designed by dhaka-bd.com